Below are the principal points about micro switch limit switches ,From right here you’ll get the product information such as description,function ,value and a few other very best related merchandise ,you will get the particulars that that is the correct to purchase and find the discount value.
when you’ll need to read extra testimonials about micro switch limit switches or relevant item , it really is easy to click the image and get more info regarding the things that you just fascinating,in case you are interested the item ,you’ll need to read much more evaluations.
Reviews: customer reviews...
List Price: unavailable
Sale Price: Too low to display.
No description available.
No features available.
There was an error connecting to the Amazon web service, or no results were found for your query.
Do you genuinely really feel that the facts and details which you may have just read satisfies your curiosity about %keywords%? In that case, send us a message of affirmation. Nevertheless, for all those who really really feel that there is a will want for improvement, please also let us know where we’re able to add considerably far more specifics. It can be our aim to make this internet site the leading resource for %keywords%. Your feedback is going to become particularly appreciated!
Evelyn H. asked What is the law of comparative advantage? Is it just the same as comparative advantage?
Is the 'law of comparative advantage' and comparative advantage the same thing? Any examples?
And got the following answer:
No the Law of competitive advantage and the Law of Comparative advantage are not the same. Comparative advantage is a Law in Economics dealing with trade between two countries/ two parties. But the theory of compatitive advantage is a theory of Business Mnangement Science and deals with how business firms can create competitive advantage in favour of them and win in the competitive market place. These are relating to business startegy of cost advantage and product differentuiation. In a sense, the theory of competitive advantage is concerned with micro-economics theory of the firm.. In economics, the theory of comparative advantage explains why it can be beneficial for two parties (countries, regions, individuals and so on) to trade if one has a lower relative cost of producing some good. What matters is not the absolute cost of production but the opportunity cost, which measures how much production of one good is reduced to produce one more unit of the other good. Comparative advantage is critical to understanding modern international trade theory.Under absolute advantage, one country can produce more output per unit of productive input than another. With comparative advantage, if one country has an absolute (dis)advantage in every type of output, the other might benefit from specializing in and exporting those products, if any exist. Two men land alone in an isolated island. To survive they must undertake a few basic economic activities like water carrying, fishing, cooking and shelter construction and maintenance. The first man is young, strong, and educated and is faster, better, more productive at everything. He has an absolute advantage in all activities. The second man is old, weak, and uneducated. He has an absolute disadvantage in all economic activities. In some activities the difference between the two is great; in others it is small. Is it in the interest of either of them to work in isolation? No, specialization and exchange (trade) can benefit both of them. How should they divide the work? According to comparative, not absolute advantage: the young man must spend more time on the tasks in which he is much better and the old man must concentrate on the tasks in which he is only a little worse. Such an arrangement will increase total production and/or reduce total labour. It will make both of them richer.Assumptions Two countries, two goods - the theory is no different for larger numbers of countries and goods, but the principles are clearer and the argument easier to follow in this simpler case. Equal size economies - again, this is a simplification to produce a clearer example. Full employment - if one or other of the economies has less than full employment of factors of production, then this excess capacity must usually be used up before the comparative advantage reasoning can be applied. Constant opportunity costs - a more realistic treatment of opportunity costs the reasoning is broadly the same, but specialization of production can only be taken to the point at which the opportunity costs in the two countries become equal. This does not invalidate the principles of comparative advantage, but it does limit the magnitude of the benefit. Perfect mobility of factors of production within countries - this is necessary to allow production to be switched without cost. In real economies this cost will be incurred: capital will be tied up in plant (sewing machines are not sowing machines) and labour will need to be retrained and relocated. This is why it is sometimes argued that 'nascent industries' should be protected from fully liberalised international trade during the period in which a high cost of entry into the market (capital equipment, training) is being paid for. Immobility of factors of production between countries. If it can be moved between countries then the production capabilities of the countries will change. Similarly the movement of labour will change that factor cost and productivity. Perfect transnational mobility of factors of production would invalidate comparative advantage. Imperfect transnational mobility reduces the mutual benefit of trade. Perfect competition - this is a standard assumption that allows perfectly efficient allocation of productive resources in an idealized free market. There is also a very illuminating example illustrated in the well known book Economics by Paul Samuelson. Imagine a city where the best lawyer happens also to be the best secretary, that is he would be the most productive lawyer and he would also be the best secretary in town. However it is quite clear that this lawyer would focus on the task of being an attorney by employing a secretary instead of doing all the paperwork by himself. This can easily be explained with the concept of comparative advantage: He is the best secretary AND the best lawyer, however by comparing what he can earn as a secretary with the income he could earn by running a law firm AND employing a secretary one can clearly see that the latter option is the better one. In contrast to the above, Competitive advantage (CA) is a position that a firm occupies in its competitive landscape. Michael Porter posits that a competitive advantage, sustainable or not, exists when a company makes economic rents, that is, their earnings exceed their costs (including cost of capital). That means that normal competitive pressures are not able to drive down the firm's earnings to the point where they cover all costs and just provide minimum sufficient additional return to keep capital invested. Most forms of competitive advantage cannot be sustained for any length of time because the promise of economic rents drives competitors to duplicate the competitive advantage held by any one firm. A firm possesses a Sustainable Competitive Advantage when it has value-creating processes and positions that cannot be duplicated or imitated by other firms that lead to the production of above normal rents. A CA is a position a firm attains that lead to above-normal rents or a superior financial performance. The processes and positions that engender such a position is not necessarily non-duplicable or inimitable. Analysis of the factors of profitability is the subject of numerous theories of strategy including the five forces model pioneered by Michael Porter of the Harvard Business School. In marketing and strategic management, sustainable competitive advantage is an advantage that one firm has relative to competing firms. The source of the advantage can be something the company does that is distinctive and difficult to replicate, also known as a core competency -- for example Procter & Gamble's ability to derive superior consumer insights and implement them in managing its brand portfolio. It can also be an asset such as a brand (e.g. Coca Cola) or a patent, such as Viagra. It can also simply be a result of the industry's cost structure -- for example, the large fixed costs that tend to create natural monopolies in utility industries. To be sustainable, the advantage must be:distinctive, and proprietary In 2006, Jaynie L. Smith authored Creating Competitive Advantage outlining how companies fail to understand their own existing competitive advantages and use them in sales/marketing. She provides a framework for how companies can evaluate their own operations and develop competitive advantage/competitive positioning statements to better hone their sales/marketing messages. Competitive advantage statements help distinguish companies by highlighting what they offer to the customer using tangible terms and concepts. The next step is to test those CA statements through independent market research. This allows a company to understand their customers' hierarchy of buying criteria in an objective indepenedent context. From there, companies can tailor their CA statements to speak directly to the buying interests of the customer. visit http://www.quickmba.com/strategy/competitive-advantage/ for an extremely short but apt article on competetive advantage.