Hi! You might be now check about iso switching power supply item where you will locate the evaluations, videos, hyperlinks and images that will certainly spark your interest. This web page supply data that you will want. There’s a whole array of sources that are waiting to be found. You can also carry on reading and search more evaluations or products as under. We have thrilling resources that have been gathered by our professionals in iso switching power supply .hope you will get the most beneficial evaluations and purchase the correct item about iso switching power supply .
Reviews: customer reviews...
List Price: unavailable
Sale Price: Too low to display.
No description available.
No features available.
There was an error connecting to the Amazon web service, or no results were found for your query.
If you would prefer to know added about %keywords%, you could click on the resources to lead you to a whole lot far more information and facts and information. You could also make use of the search box to additional lead you to other articles. If you would like to contribute to this website,we would adore to hear your recommendations! It would be terrific to have you share your thoughts about %keywords%. Seriously really feel completely totally free to send an e mail to us.
And got the following answer:
Depends on where the gasoline is from. If it's simply distilled from hydrocarbons extracted from the Earth, it's made of hydrogen and carbon that has been sequestered from the environment for millions of years and combined with oxygen from the environment to produce CO2 and H2O, resulting in a net increase of CO2 and H2O in the environment and a net decrease of O2 in the environment and this is cumulative. If we synthesize it directly from CO2 and H2O gathered from the environment or from biomass harvested from the environment then it doesn't result in a net change of anything in the environment. We've known how to synthesize products such as iso-octane (gasoline) and iso-decane (diesel and kerosene) from carbon monoxide and hydrogen gas since the early 1920's (Fischer Tropsch synthesis). We also have known how to make carbon monoxide and hydrogen gases from just about anything that burns including trash and dried sewage in a process called gasification since the 1800's and indeed that's what we used as "town gas" before we had natural gas. We've used gasification and Fischer Tropsche synthesis on commercial levels in WWII Germany, in embargoed South Africa, in the US airforce as a strategic supply, and to dilute our high sulfur diesel in order to meet the new ultra low sulfur diesel requirements (Shell's GTL plant). It's also how we "upgrade" the heavy bitumen of the tar/oil sands of Alberta and the oil shale of the US into marketable fuel products. It is ironic how it's more profitable to strip mine vast areas of Alberta to gasify into syngas (hydroen and carbon monoxide gases) to synthesize fuel then it is to gather up biomass such as storm debris for the same purpose. The synthesis of gasoline from gasified biomass such as trash and dried sewage can actually be carbon negative if the charcoal byproduct is sequestered as biochar. Hence using gasoline can do something that electric vehicles and hydrogen powered cars can't do and that's to undo some of the damage that we have caused, all without replacing a single vehicle, just by changing how we make our fuel. Mind you electricity can also be made from syngas which is what some plasma torch incinerator trash disposal plants are doing with the resulting syngas, but electric vehicles and hydrogen fuel cell cars would still incur the environmental cost of replacing existing vehicles with new vehicles (a boon for the auto industry and for middle america but at a cost to the environment). Basically we don't need new vehicles to switch to clean energy but many of us will profit from making and selling new vehicles to do so. We have the technology and we even have most of the equipment needed to make gasoline from the environment rather than from fossil reserves, it's just that we make more money distilling it from the fossil reserves as the cost to our environment isn't factored in due to the tragedy of the commons. That's not to say that shared use of a resource such as our environment is bound to inevitable disaster, there have been cases of properly managed common resources but these are resources where people have actively assumed the responsibility of stewarding the resource and we're only now beginning to do so with our environment on a global scale.